c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs

[Paolo Carlini]

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Yes, that is a known limitation of current parser (I think, it is even
> a FAQ).  Hopefully, the parser handles that correctly.  I think Nathan
> Sidwelll already has a testcase for that.

Hi Gaby.
You mean c++/4862 or c++/5577 ??
What surprised me is that the *new* parser still needs the ".template" trick for
c++/5577.

Cheers,
Paolo.