c++/4862 and PRs marked (or not) as parser bugs

[Paolo Carlini]

Paolo Carlini wrote:

> What seems to me strange, is that the *new* parser must *also* be helped like
> this (not EDG front ends). Is this known? Should c++/4862 and, perhaps, similar
> situations, be marked as "New-parser bug" in GNATS?

In fact, is more complicated than this... In fact (sorry) the new parser compiles
without problem c++/4862 testcase. Not so c++/5577. I have reopened it and marked
as a new-parses bug.

Cheers,
Paolo.