GCC still getting a lot slower
Paul Jarc
prj@po.cwru.edu
Tue Dec 31 14:49:00 GMT 2002
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> Frankly, I don't think we should look at bootstrap time. A number of
> the largest changes in B-I-B were necessary build process changes, which
> are quite likely to slow down the build *of* the compiler, but not the
> performance of the compiler. Or, in other words, "so what?". ;-)
As someone else noted a while ago, bootstrap times are important
because changes are tested by bootstrapping. So slow bootstraps slow
down all other progress.
> Can we test compile time change of some *fixed* piece of code, perhaps?
That would also be useful, in its own way.
paul
More information about the Gcc
mailing list