basic-improvements merge status
Jan Hubicka
jh@suse.cz
Tue Dec 17 14:06:00 GMT 2002
>
>
> --On Tuesday, December 17, 2002 09:46:35 AM +0100 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
> wrote:
>
> >OK, I will create updated patch with TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS macro and set
> >it via linux.h file. Does this sound sane?
>
> It sounds OK to me, but it sounds like some people (for example, Gaby)
> think we can do better via autoconf. It we can do it with autoconf,
> that's better, I guess.
What I don't like about autoconf is that we can't do that completely
reliably - we can't do that when cross compiling or when there are
multiple possible runtime, like in mingw.
I will send the TARGET_* as soon as I finish testing and lets discuss
futher improvement on top of that. OK?
Honza
>
> Would you explore that alternative? If that doesn't look doable, then,
> yes, TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS sounds good.
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list