basic-improvements merge status

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

| --On Monday, December 16, 2002 11:50:51 PM +0100 Jan Hubicka
| <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
| 
| >> >>>>> Jan Hubicka writes:
| >>
| >> Jan> As I've mentined I am handling this with the other patch that
| >> disables Jan> the transfomration for C90 until we decide how to detect
| >> such systems. Jan> On C99 and C++ it is always valid as runtime is
| >> required to have it (and Jan> thats why libstdc++ does it).  I hope
| >> Richard will have time to take a Jan> look on these patches soon.
| >>
| >> 	Would you please include a pointer to the patch?  I have been
| >> browsing your patches and cannot find one that fixes this problem.
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-11/msg00619.html
| 
| I agree with Neil -- this isn't the right fix.  As he says, the C99
| switch indicates that the source is C99 source; we should't make any
| assumptions about the target library based on that.
| 
| Please revert, or at least disable, your change until we can figure out
| how to do the configury bits.  (One possibility is explicitly flags in
| the tm.h file.)

100% agreed.

-- Gaby