basic-improvements merge status

[Jan Hubicka]

> David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> | >>>>> Jan Hubicka writes:
> | 
> | >> #ifndef HAVE_SINF
> | >> float
> | >> sinf(float x)
> | >> {
> | >> return (float) sin(x);
> | >> }
> | >> #endif
> | >> 
> | >> is being compiled as
> | 
> | Jan> I think we can deal with -fno-builtin-fsin to avoid gcc from being
> | Jan> active on optimizing this.
> | Jan> The name sinf is reserved by C90 standard, so this is not valid C.
> | 
> | 	Maybe libstdc++-v3/libmath/stubs.c should be compiled with
> | -fno-builtins.
> 
> This is papering over broken assumptions made by the transformation.
> 
> Moreover, not all functions are missing at the same time.  So
> -fno-builtin will be overly pessimistic an assumption.  There ought to
> be a way to tell the compiler which library function not to optimize.

-fno-builtin-sin does the trick.

Honza
> 
> -- Gaby