basic-improvements merge status

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Mon Dec 16 17:05:00 GMT 2002



--On Monday, December 16, 2002 11:50:51 PM +0100 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> 
wrote:

>> >>>>> Jan Hubicka writes:
>>
>> Jan> As I've mentined I am handling this with the other patch that
>> disables Jan> the transfomration for C90 until we decide how to detect
>> such systems. Jan> On C99 and C++ it is always valid as runtime is
>> required to have it (and Jan> thats why libstdc++ does it).  I hope
>> Richard will have time to take a Jan> look on these patches soon.
>>
>> 	Would you please include a pointer to the patch?  I have been
>> browsing your patches and cannot find one that fixes this problem.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-11/msg00619.html

I agree with Neil -- this isn't the right fix.  As he says, the C99
switch indicates that the source is C99 source; we should't make any
assumptions about the target library based on that.

Please revert, or at least disable, your change until we can figure out
how to do the configury bits.  (One possibility is explicitly flags in
the tm.h file.)

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com



More information about the Gcc mailing list