basic-improvements merge status

[Jan Hubicka]

> 
> On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:44  PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >On C99 and C++ it is always valid as runtime is required to have it 
> >(and
> >thats why libstdc++ does it).
> 
> According to the C99 standard, this is right, but GCC does not control 
> the
> runtime libraries.  What should the behavior of -std=c99 be, when 
> generating code
> for a target with non-C99-conformant libraries?

I don't know.  It is interesting combination at least (like C without
runtime).
It would be best to push these into libgcc when runtime does not
overwrite these.  Is that doable?  

Honza