GNATS policy question
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Fri Dec 13 08:39:00 GMT 2002
> Low priority sounds good to me.
>
> Three final questions:
> * Should we add "[error-recovery]" to the synopsis line so that one does
> not stumble over those bugs over and over again?
No; I think that will get too crowded. But a note in the audit trail
would be nice.
> * Shall I prepare a patch for the policies section of gnatswrite.html
> to document the procedure?
Yes, please.
> * There are some bugs in GNATS that were closed because a "confused by
> earlier ..." message was issued. Shall I reopen them?
No, it's really not worth spending that much effort on this class of
bugs. Once we never, ever silently generate bad code we can worry much
more about these kinds of things... :-)
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list