compile time regressions (was: merging for 3.4)
Neil Booth
neil@daikokuya.co.uk
Mon Dec 9 23:26:00 GMT 2002
Dan Nicolaescu wrote:-
> It looks like there was a significant increase in the garbage
> collection time. It's strange that GC is so expensive for C++
> compilation.
I think GC is turning out to be a mistake, even though it saves
us from nasty memory issues. It means we have no idea what code
is gradually getting worse; it just shows up as "GC". And it
gives poor locality.
Neil.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list