Dumping RTL???

[Svein E. Seldal]

Andrew Haley wrote:

> It's deliberate because we don't want someone to be able to use the
> front end of gcc with an unfree back end.

Hmm... gcc is open source... A company like this could ""simply"" alter 
gcc to produce complete RTL output and then use their unfree backend 
anyways? Given that they release the gcc-patch-source, am I right? Or is 
this sceanrio merely academic?

Svein