merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)
Toon Moene
toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl
Wed Dec 4 14:05:00 GMT 2002
Neil Booth wrote:
> There must be ways of getting it faster. lcc is a *lot* faster, a lot
> smaller, and doesn't produce code that is much worse. Its parser is well-
> written; I'd bet it's faster than LCC's CPP. Most of our parser problems
> come from a poor tree IL and bison.
>
> I vote we force GCC developers to bootstrap on 100MHz Pentia for 1 year.
Must be the language.
Once again I'm repeating the old adage: People *never* complain to my
about the speed of g77, just about the speed of the generated code.
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)
More information about the Gcc
mailing list