endless loop in compute_inverse bootstrapping on alpha

[Zack Weinberg]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 09:55:36PM -0500, Brad Lucier wrote:
> > I prefer my patch because it makes an explicit assumption -- that
> > big-order pages can contain only one object -- verifies it, and then
> > uses values which are safe and predictable.  And because it doesn't
> > require the inverse_table to be bigger.
> 
> That's the patch that's tested at
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-08/msg00800.html

Thanks.

I've gone ahead and checked it in.

zw