GCC 3.2 Released

[Robert Schiele]

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 10:45:31AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:11:49PM +0200, Robert Schiele wrote:
> > Ok, again the systems on which I have built this version:
> 
> Thanks!  Your message and your test results are now linked from the
> GCC 3.2 build status page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/buildstat.html .
> 
> > 
> > // System 1: /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > 
> > # config.guess
> > i686-pc-linux-gnu
> 
> I entered this one with the config.guess output, but just noticed that
> it was built for i486, not i686, so I'll change that next time I update
> the file.
> 
> Do you have an opinion about whether the entry should be "suse" rather
> than "unknown"?  This is a new list so I can change the conventions a
> bit from the other build status lists.

I have no opinion about that, as I think it doesn't really matter
whether this is built/run on a SuSE, RedHat, Debian or whatever
system.  In fact it doesn't matter, whether you set vendor to "suse",
"redhat", "pc" or write a funny joke between the two dashes. ;-)
Because of that your page is ok for me.

The reason that "suse" is in the triple is just that I am using the
compiler in our heterogeneous cluster build system which also uses
some cross compilers and the SuSE provided binaries that are
i486-suse-linux.  Because of that I have configured the cluster to use
i486-suse-linux for all ia32 linux systems to make things easier and
to be able to use the SuSE binaries also.  (Might be, it is also
because of those funny T-shirts they send me from time to time. ;-)

> 
> > // System 2: /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > 
> > # config.guess
> > sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
> 
> I entered this on as sparc-unknown-linux-gnu.  Same question about
> "suse" rather than "unknown".

This is the same issue.  It's just the cluster that is configured to
use sparc-suse-linux for all sparc linux systems.

Robert

-- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQEVAwUBPVv1xsQAnns5HcHpAQG/vQf/XpyQbuGoZYrCrqr9Ro7FLfEXBhxgWu3N
gjuhC7cUQLZ5WN6FSLBFXeR6hDfz1TZgAgNv+3xnpkFxVopFmx1xxvz7wHYrxjRV
D7lTz27ZKppP5muRZSE3oKG43KVBaQjfpIyH0eB5bsWcf9y9/vU0TaV24MvFwwFk
r/lOCxDn2pM+Jj4VYheRU09Wo99rgDHn6Jdrmeb+hVyl45nzKwsbcvhZUfODRx52
E0YLPlH+rNbJBjMP03J6DTW+tOdg4oOtpH50scXJst778PgbZt0zfqZHzAzOtve/
5Hmvv/ZZJ9hr55wZerQoCbfWBfbmkxFE64Y5tOr51KrqR5HdJrIQtw==
=s2ru
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----