g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2?

[Franz Sirl]

On Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2002 17:54, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while comparing i686-linux-gnu testsuite results, I noticed that
> g++.pt/repo3.C fails at -O2 in 3.2, is this a regression or expected?
>
> Ah, while we are at potential ABI problems, g++.abi/bitfields.C fails with
> -funsigned-char on i686-linux-gnu.

Mark, what about these? Can we safely ignore them for 3.2?

Franz.