[jakub@redhat.com: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?]
Artur Grabowski
art@openbsd.org
Mon Sep 10 08:48:00 GMT 2001
Marc Espie <espie@schutzenberger.liafa.jussieu.fr> writes:
> From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: 2.95.4, sparc64 issues ?
> To: Marc.Espie@liafa.jussieu.fr
> Cc: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@redhat.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:56:15 +0200
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:49:14PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > It seems that libstdc++ does not compile on every sparc64 machine,
> > and that the following patch (from current) might be enough to fix it ?
>
> Targeting -m64 on sparc with gcc 2.95.x is a bad idea, this is not the only
> place which needs changing.
>
> Jakub
Since it's a bad idea and noone in their right mind will try to use it, it
won't hurt if you put that diff in because noone should notice, right?
Not fixing bugs with the motivation that there are other bugs feels like a
catch 22.
I really don't want OpenBSD to get into the position of other operating systems
that must compile the system with different versions of gcc for every
architecture. Right now we can almost get a working system for sparc64 with
some makefile changes (-O0 on some files) and some minor compiler fixes.
//art
More information about the Gcc
mailing list