2.95.4 release?
Franz Sirl
Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com
Sun Sep 9 15:07:00 GMT 2001
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 13:14, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I'd like to determine whether we should have a 2.95.4 release. Could those
> who
>
> a) would like to see one
> b) would be willing to test prereleases
>
> please speak up? I'm especially looking for testers with sparc systems;
> I'd like to see a few larger packages built and tested on those systems
> with the current branch sources.
If you do a new release, it should contain this patch backport from 3.0 that
prevents miscompilation of glibc on some platforms in presence of weak symbol
references. The other glibc supporting patch is Jakub's __dso_handle patch
which works fine on PPC too.
Franz.
* rtl.h (SYMBOL_REF_WEAK): New macro.
* rtlanal.h (rtx_addr_can_trap): Use it, a weak SYMBOL_REF can trap.
* varasm.c (make_decl_rtl): Mark SYMBOL_REF weak if necessary.
* rtl.texi (SYMBOL_REF_WEAK): Document it.
* gcc.texi: Remove wrong description.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list