[RFC] Cleaning and extening the diagnostics machinery
Bill Wendling
wendling@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Thu May 31 14:58:00 GMT 2001
Also sprach Joseph S. Myers:
} On 31 May 2001, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
}
} > - "Sorry, unimplemented: " for unimplemented fonctionalities;
}
} I'd like two versions of this, one which acts as an error and one which
} acts as a warning.
}
Shouldn't it always act as an error? I.e., the compiler can't interpret
it, so the code it generates won't be what the programmer wanted?
--
|| Bill Wendling wendling@ncsa.uiuc.edu
|| Coding Simian
|| Jaj Istenem, de fejsze van a fejemben!! (Hungarian)
More information about the Gcc
mailing list