current_funcdef_number vs. except.c

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Mon May 21 14:19:00 GMT 2001


>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

    Richard> Short term, either we can move the definition to
    Richard> except.c, or move it in dwarf2out.c such that it's
    Richard> outside the ifdefs.  I guess I don't care which.
    Richard> Preferences?

I guess the latter alternative, since this number is used mostly for
DWARF2.  Or, make the computation of funcdef_number in except.c #if'd
on the right condition, instead of doing a run-time `if', much as I
dislike that. :-(

Either way, thanks.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com



More information about the Gcc mailing list