RFA: non-const libcalls

[Mark Mitchell]

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

    Richard> This distinction is meaningless.  The call pattern is
    Richard> atomic as far as the compiler is concerned.

Ah, even better.  I was confused by this, which is why asked Alexandre
to explain it -- but if there's no actual distinction, then we can
just remove the paragraph entirely, which will confuse me even
less. :-)

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com