RFA: non-const libcalls

[Alexandre Oliva]

On May  8, 2001, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

>>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
>>> The TeXinfo documentation says that CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE
>>> should only have CLOBBERs for hard registers, but we go ahead
>>> and put MEMs there too.  What's up with all that?

Alexandre> It seems that I forgot to update the docs, though.  Ok
Alexandre> to install?  Branch and mainline?

> Yes, with a couple of minor changes:

> I think there's an important idea in here, but it's not coming out
> with these words.  Can you expand on that a little and/or provide an
> example that shows what assumptions you can make it the two different
> cases?

How's this?  Ok to install?