List of simplifications we should perform
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@redhat.com
Fri May 11 22:27:00 GMT 2001
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> The drawback of that approach is that you'd then need an ML implementation
> around in order to compile GCC. Unfortunately GCC doesn't have an ML
>
Yes, that's true. Much like we require the presence of bison for
parse.y.
> <plug>
> There is however another high-level functional language, quite similar
> in many ways to ML, for which there is a GCC front-end...
> </plug>
>
> ;-)
>
There you go then. Care to write an optimizer generator in
Mercury? :)
Diego.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list