32->64 bit cross compilers

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Apr 26, 2001, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

>>	Re-installed 2001-01-09's patch:
>>	* hwint.h (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT, HOST_WIDE_INT): Use long long
>>	if it's wider than long and the target's long is wider than the
>>	host's.

> Yes, this is OK.  Thanks.

> What do you suggest doing for the branch?

How about installing the CONST_INT sign-extension fixes, but not the
stricter checks?  Then, we could install this patch in the branch too?

> I think we don't want the CONST_INT sign-extension patches at this
> point.

All of them are relatively obvious bug-fixes.  It's only the strict
checks that may expose hidden bugs that we might want to keep hidden
in the branch.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me