FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950628-1.c execution, -O1

[Richard Henderson]

On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 04:47:55PM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> I think the former needs more discussion, but I'd say that for 3.0
> the *safest* approach is to "allow" multiple stores by changing the
> remaining dependence function.  That's both the smallest and safest change.

I don't agree, mostly because of the useage for function invariance
I mentioned before.  IMO the *safest* change is not to combine /u
slots.  I have a patch for objects_must_conflict_p to do that, but
have been waiting to see how the discussion resolves before doing
anything with it.

I'd also advocate removing the non-source-language /u bits from your
Dec 30 change from the branch, but leave them in mainline.


r~