g++ 2.95 typeinfo::name()

dewar@gnat.com dewar@gnat.com
Mon Jan 22 21:58:00 GMT 2001


<<I'm sorry; maybe I'm missing something.  I thought the discussion was about
a *required* function with undefined semantics.  It seems to me that there
has to be some kind of deterministic behavior.  If this behavior exists,
what is wrong with documenting it?
>>

Where do you deduce that the semantics must be deterministic?


More information about the Gcc mailing list