gcc manuals -vs- @dircategory
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Tue Jan 16 18:51:00 GMT 2001
Right now the gcc manuals all do this:
@dircategory Programming
In the Texinfo manual it says this:
Here are some recommended `@dircategory' categories: `GNU packages',
`GNU programming tools', `GNU programming documentation', `GNU Emacs
Lisp', `GNU libraries', `Linux', `TeX', `Individual utilities'. The
idea is to include the `invoking' node for every program installed by a
package under `Individual utilities', and an entry for the manual as a
whole in the appropriate other category.
Should we be using `GNU programming tools' instead?
Finally, I notice that we install and document gcov, but we don't
mention it in the `Individual utilities' section. Is this
intentional?
Tom
More information about the Gcc
mailing list