redhat rawhide

[mitch(rezn)]

I suppose so but it's still a messy situation. Such issues like that will
cause people to not want to use redhat.


Richard Kenner wrote:

>     I can see why they might need to stick with 2.96 because of redhat 7.0
>     but still. Could you please give one valid reason for them doing this
>     over using gcc 2.95?
>
> That's past history.  You can't "unring the bell".  I think a lot of
> people agree that was a bad choice, but now that they've done it, I
> don't think they have much choice but to continue to distribute that
> compiler until GCC 3.0 is released.