Branching for GCC 3.0

[Jonathan Larmour]

Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> > If gcc is branched now, does this mean that the libgcc ABI is now set
> > in stone?
> 
> It was our intention to have an ABI that would live for a long time or
> at least be backward-compatible.  So anything that conflicts with that
> needs to be resolved in a hurry.

Thinking about another option, would there be any difficulties with ABI
changes for targets that don't use a shared libgcc? Presumably not since
it's the same as before?

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Un cheval, pas du glue. Pas du cheval, beaucoup du glue. || Opinions==mine