Is this supposed to work, or am I loopy?
Phil Edwards
pedwards@disaster.jaj.com
Fri Jan 5 10:18:00 GMT 2001
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:14:13AM -0800, Nick Clifton wrote:
> :
> : Is there nothing supported under Linux other than using a pair of -Wl
> : options? According to its manual, GNU ld would recognize -Rfoo as a runtime
> : library search path setting when foo is a directory, if the driver weren't
> : killing it first.
>
> What's wrong with using -Wl, ? It is only four more characters to
> type, and it will then work on all build environments.
>
> g++ -Wl,-R/home/pme/build/install-2001-01-04/lib huh.cc
Nothing's *wrong* with it. Just
1) wanted to make certain I wasn't missing anything obvious, and
2) it seems a bit on the gratuitiously incompatible side.
A user brought (2) to my attention ("gcc takes -R under everything else,
gcc doesn't take -R under linux, ergo linux is broken") and I wanted to
test it with the current sources.
Phil
--
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list