documenting libiberty

[Phil Edwards]

On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 03:39:38PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> 
> Feel free to start the ball rolling on libiberty.texi :-)

Oh, have been.  What I have in mind (read: what I've started writing at
least :-) breaks the functions into three categories:

  - supplementals which provide functionality on systems for which that
    function is missing

  - replacements for functions which may be there anyway (right now only
    alloca falls into that category I think)

  - extensions providing new functionality (xmalloc, dyn-string, obstacks,
    choose-temp, etc)

Maybe the second category-of-one should be part of one of the others.


-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.