Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Fri Feb 23 19:46:00 GMT 2001


On Feb 23, 2001, Jamie Lokier <egcs@tantalophile.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Geert Bosch wrote:
>> I really think we should have moved the exception stuff into a 
>> separate library.

> I agree, and it should have an ABI and all.

So do I.  That's the easiest way to make sure its ABI is stable and
well-controlled.  Then, all of the rest of libgcc just won't matter,
and we can go back to the static version by default.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me



More information about the Gcc mailing list