Shared library annoyance with gcc-3_0-branch

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Feb 20, 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:

> Could we somehow get away with not linking shared libraries to the
> shared libgcc unless they used C++, and requiring dynamic libgcc in
> applications which wished to have correct exception handling and use
> C++ shared libraries?

AFAICT, this would be pretty much equivalent to having all bits of
libgcc in a shared libstdc++.  Which is exactly the situation we have
now (as in, with the latest stable release).

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me