Using 'at-pr' for bugs? and maybe patches?

[Phil Edwards]

Two utterly unrelated policy questions:

    1)  Is our GNATS database configured to use 'at-pr' to send us
        reminders when PRs haven't been touched for a while?  I suspect
        it isn't.

    2)  What about a variation on GNATS to use for submitted patches?
        (For that matter, we could probably *use* GNATS, just a different
        database.)  This might help address the problem of unreviewed
        patches falling through the cracks.  Again, at-pr could probably
        help us here.


Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.