GCC 3.0 Bugs: Call for Volunteers

[James Dennett]

Neil Booth wrote:
> 
> James Dennett wrote:-
> 
> > Really "do nothing" -- not even mark up the Description field to
> > acknowledge that the bug has been reproduced with with 3.0 branch
> > code?  If seems to me that if we don't note that the bug has been
> > reproduced then we run the risk of doing the same work twice.
> 
> On most of the bug reports I verify, I update the "version" field
> to include the CVS version I reproduced it on.
> 
> Neil.

Not necessarily a bad idea, but does this then lose information
about which version the bug was originally filed against?  That
information can be useful at time like the present when regression
against 2.95.2 is considered in some ways more vital than absoluates.

-- James.