gcc/resource.c mark_target_live_regs Question
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Fri Feb 16 09:13:00 GMT 2001
In message < 20010215094346K.mitchell@codesourcery.com >you write:
> Why is it still safe, then, to go back all the way to the previous
> BARRIER and then use the global_live_at_start information for the
> basic block that starts at this point?
I don't know the precise details (I'd have to sit down a re-read jump
and reorg). But the basic idea is that the state at the barrier is
known to be stable for some reason. We can go forward from there.
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list