On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 09:31:14AM +0100, Michael Matz wrote: > No no, I never said, it's slow. It's faster than bitmaps in nearly every > case we have in ra.c. It's not faster than sbitmaps as they are used now > in ra.c in any case besides clearing. It is faster when sbitmaps start swapping. Or possibly even fall out of cache. r~