Web pages still refer to Chill

[Trevor Jenkins]

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Joseph S. Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
> 
> > > Chill should surely get excluded from the 3.0 release tarballs / diffs if
> > > not fixed by then though.
> > 
> > When is "then".
> 
> The time the 3.0 release script is finalised and prerelease tarballs start
> being prepared.

I was hoping for a more calendrical measure. :-)

> (Of course, if you don't already have them on file, you'll need to get a
> copyright assignment (and possibly an employer disclaimer) on file at the
> FSF, since this work will surely be big enough to require them.)

There is nothing from/for me on file. I'll get that sorted out.

> Other things that could be cleaned up in the Chill subdirectory, ...

You omitted one very important issue, which is why I'm prepared to
volunteer. Documentation. My personal goal in keeping Chill in GCC v3 is
so I get a grip upon integrating front-ends into GCC.

Regards, Trevor

British Sign Language is not inarticulate handwaving; it's a living language.
Support the campaign for formal recognition by the British government now!

-- 

<>< Re: deemed!