Web pages still refer to Chill

[Richard Earnshaw]

> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> 
> > In fact, I wonder whether we should remove Chill from the tree, as
> > apparently there is no interest at all in this.
> 
> Converting Chill to use gc is on the projects page; I think it would be a
> reasonable candidate to go on Zack's list of projects for beginners (most
> of the work being fairly mecahnical removal of obstack manipulation and
> registration of gc roots).  But, for a volunteer to work on it, it would
> probably help if Red Hat were to do the work to get clearance from their
> customer to release their Chill testsuite (mentioned before on the mailing
> lists).
> 
> Chill should surely get excluded from the 3.0 release tarballs / diffs if
> not fixed by then though.

Might be an idea to leave it on the trunk but delete it from the 3.0 
branch after it has been made.

R.