A new regression from the inlining fix

[Jason Merrill]

>>>>> "Neil" == Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:

> It looks to me like my patch has uncovered an inlining issue
> elsewhere.  It appears that something is getting tree inlined and not
> put in the object file when it should be, or a reference to it is not
> being removed when it should be.  Or maybe the test requires extra
> flags?

Actually, the problem was that Nathan stripped the '# lineno' lines when he
was fixing tests to avoid implicit typename.  I've put them back, and the
test passes again.

Jason