[RFC] Design issues with multiple IRs

[Richard Henderson]

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:11:37PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The right fix probably isn't to rename them (especially as the tree-dump
> files were only just renamed from c-dump) - it's to make enough of
> functions as trees language-independent that these files no longer include
> C front end headers or call C front end functions, just using language
> hooks for anything that genuinely is C/C++-specific.

And indeed I believe that this must be addressed before anything
from the ast-branch may be merged to mainline.  Ideally we'd address
this on ast-branch *now* rather than continuing to push this off
into the indefinite future.


r~