messy combine problem - PPC
Zack Weinberg
zack@codesourcery.com
Tue Dec 4 10:06:00 GMT 2001
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 10:34:31PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > or is there something else that takes care of that?
>
> Yes, that call_used_regs killing loop in record_dead_and_set_regs.
I get it now, thanks for clarifying. I'm testing this patch.
zw
* combine.c (record_dead_and_set_regs): Use regs_invalidated_by_call.
Do not call note_stores for CALL_INSNs.
===================================================================
Index: combine.c
--- combine.c 2001/11/11 11:25:14 1.241
+++ combine.c 2001/12/04 18:05:50
@@ -11178,7 +11178,7 @@ record_dead_and_set_regs (insn)
if (GET_CODE (insn) == CALL_INSN)
{
for (i = 0; i < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; i++)
- if (call_used_regs[i])
+ if (TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (regs_invalidated_by_call, i))
{
reg_last_set_value[i] = 0;
reg_last_set_mode[i] = 0;
@@ -11188,6 +11188,13 @@ record_dead_and_set_regs (insn)
}
last_call_cuid = mem_last_set = INSN_CUID (insn);
+
+ /* Don't bother recording what this insn does. It might set the
+ return value register, but we can't combine into a call
+ pattern anyway, so there's no point trying (and it may cause
+ a crash, if e.g. we wind up asking for last_set_value of a
+ SUBREG of the return value register). */
+ return;
}
note_stores (PATTERN (insn), record_dead_and_set_regs_1, insn);
More information about the Gcc
mailing list