broken link

[Joe Buck]

> 
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Murali Potla wrote:
> > The link to gcc 3.0.1 is not proper.
> 
> Sorry, but you didn't provide sufficient information.
> 
> Where (on which page) is that link...
> 
> > it's pointing to 3.0 release.
> 
> ...and where does it point to?

He probably means that the link with the text "3.0.1" points to the page

gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0.html

and he didn't notice that this now has a 3.0.1 announcement, probably
because the link color indicates that he already visited that page.  This
is because you erased history, Gerald.  There should be a new
gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0.1.html page.  The reason is that if you go further down on
the page, you see

June 18, 2001
	GCC 3.0 has been released.

with a link that now points to the 3.0.1 announcement.  The original
3.0 announcement was overwritten.  The web site should contain both
announcements in two separate pages, or at least two places on the
same page.