denormals/subnormals are heading for extinction
Scott A Crosby
crosby@qwes.math.cmu.edu
Thu Aug 16 18:02:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 dewar@gnat.com wrote:
> >>I am unqualified to judge one way or another. Nor did I.
>
> That sounds like you do not understand the important advantages of denormals.
> Again for a simple explanation, see chapter 5 of my book.
Sure, I'm interested in hearing why..
Title and/or Author of this book? (And/or got a URL for chapter 5?)
>
> No one ever said there is no cost to the implementation (having written
> several full IEEE software implementations, I know very well what the cost
> is), where did you get that idea?
>
Because you had said:
``Again, I am thinking about the entire overall performance of a complete
application (nothing else is relevant).''
Which indicated that you were ignoring any costs of implementaiton
complexity.
Scott.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list