gcc 3.0.1 & C++ ABI issues

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Jason Merrill <jason_merrill@redhat.com> writes:


| FWIW, the old, more general wording was:

   [ quote snipped for brevity ]

| The optimization was restricted to temporaries and the NRVO in the October
| '97 working paper.  I don't rember the example that motivated this change;
| perhaps the example above was thought excessive.  I would think that
| treating parameters as temporaries in our earlier example would make sense
| in the context of inlining; I would expect them to look about the same in
| the tree structure.

Thanks for the historical settings which add more light to the issue. 

I agree with you on treating parameters as temporaries in the context
of inlining.

-- Gaby