bug 2645 and restrict

[Mark Mitchell]

>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> writes:

    Nathan> The standard says typedef int &ref_t; ref_t const thing =
    Nathan> i; is legal, and thing has type `int &'. so, should
    Nathan> typedef int i_t; i_t __restrict__ thing; be legal with
    Nathan> thing having type `int'?

Boy, I have no idea.  But I guess accepting it for consistency makes
sense to me.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com