PR2076
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Wed Apr 25 14:17:00 GMT 2001
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 02:00:11PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
> It's probably because of STRICT_ARGUMENT_NAMING.
Indeed it is.
> This is a compatibility hack that causes the last argument to a
> varargs function to be treated as unnamed, because that's how GCC
> used to do it and some backends rely on it (it could change the ABI).
Ug. It does indeed change the abi. What a crock. Well, any
idea how xlc treats this situation? I suspect they don't load
do this sort of thing, at which point we can make this change
as a compatability bug fix.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list