Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers

David Edelsohn dje@watson.ibm.com
Tue Apr 17 19:46:00 GMT 2001

Previous message (by thread): Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers
Next message (by thread): Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

	The ELF architecture field in the header is assigned, not
something that one can "pick a new specifier" without causing conflicts. 

David

Previous message (by thread): Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers
Next message (by thread): Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc mailing list