Esthetics (or worse?) of Secure Pointers

[Geoff Keating]

Robert Bernecky <bernecky@acm.org> writes:

> 	What is the appropriate way to introduce an incompatible
>         glibc, preferably in a way that lets it coexist with
>         the existing glibc?

This should really be asked on the glibc mailing lists, but since it's
here, I think that the existing bounded-pointer approach in glibc is 
as good or better than the alternatives you listed.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>