Build gcc-2.95.3 with UDK 7.1.1b anyone?

Jean-Pierre Radley jpr@jpr.com
Tue Apr 17 09:47:00 GMT 2001


Robert Lipe propounded (on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:44:13AM -0500):
| Jean-Pierre Radley wrote:
| > Boyd Lynn Gerber propounded (on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 05:06:07AM +0000):
| > | Has anyone been able to build gcc-2.95.2 with the new UDK?
| > | 
| > | This is how I have tried with out success many errors!
| > | 
| > | CC=/bin/cc ./configure
| > | /usr/local/bin/make bootstrap
| > | 
| > | I am using gnu make.
| > 
| > Bootstraps of gcc, whether 2.95.2 or 3.0, have not worked with SCO's UDK
| > since some time last fall.
| 
| The development snapshots as of this morning would probably work with
| the new UDK if C++ was disabled.  (See my bug report of an hour or two
| ago.)   2.95.[23] may choke on some of the new C99-isms introduced in the
| new UDK libraries and system compiler.
| 
| Provide specifics (or even better; patches) to the gcc lists.
| 
| 
| The one thing that I do know of that won't work with your example is
| that GCC's definition of 'inline' isn't quite the C99 version of inline
| and that while it passes the configure step, it will bomb during the build.
| So you have to disable /bin/cc's inline with
| 	CC="/bin/cc -Xb" /path/to/configure 

/bin/cc?  Boyd was talking about the UDK compiler.

-- 
JP



More information about the Gcc mailing list