which desktop for gcc tools

[Phil Edwards]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:27:13PM -0600, Scott Durrant wrote:
> beat your wife?  what the hell?

*sigh*  Go to jargon.org and look up the entry for "mu".  Apparently not
everyone in America has heard of this paradox yet after all.

Like Toshi explains in the next paragraph, your question -- like his example
-- cannot be answered because it makes fundamentally incorrect assumptions.


> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Toshi Morita wrote:
> > > Which desktop is least buggy for running the gcc tools on redhat 6.2? 
> > 
> > Mu.
> > 
> > This is like the classical question "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"
> > 
> > A basic assumption of your question is wrong; namely that the choice of
> > desktop affects the stability of GCC.

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.